Bees’ health damaged by common agricultural... - Wissenschaft und Deutsch

Bees’ health damaged by common agricultural chemicals, researchers find


Previously, researchers did not believe fungicides had a negative effect since they’re not designed to kill insects.

The study, published this week in the journal PLOS ONE, is the first to analyze real-world conditions honey bees encounter while pollinating various types of crops.
Researchers from the University of Maryland and the U.S. Department of Agriculture collected pollen samples from hives in Delaware all the way to Maine. Samples were analyzed to determine the bees’ main pollen sources and what agricultural chemicals commingled with the pollen. To test their ability to resist Nosema ceranae – a parasite linked to colony collapse disorder – the researchers fed the collected pollen samples to healthy bees
Every sample contained sub-lethal levels of multiple agricultural chemicals, with an average of 9 different chemicals being present. One sample containing 21 different pesticides. Fungicide chlorothalonil, a pesticide commony used on apples, and fluvalinate, an insecticide used by beekeepers to control mites, were present most frequently.
Surprisingly, the study found that bees fed pollen samples containing chlorothonatil were almost three times as likely to be infected by Nosema, than bees not exposed to the fungicide. The insecticide used to control mites also impaired the bees’ ability to withstand nfection.
Beekeepers are aware of the risks involved in using miticides, as the chemicals compromise a bee’s immune system. But the damage is less than if mites were left unchecked. However, the discovery that common fungicides are harmful at real world dosages is new information, pointing to gaps in existing regulations.
Previously, researchers did not believe fungicides had a negative effect since they’re not designed to kill insects. At present, federal regulations restrict the use of insecticides while pollinating insects are foraging, but there are no such restrictions on fungicides. In light of this new information, researchers suggest this policy be reconsidered.
Unexpectedly, most of the crops being pollinated did not appear to provide their hives with much nourishment. When the team collected samples from bees foraging native North American crops, like blueberries and watermelon, they discovered the pollen came from other flowering plants in the area. This suggests that honey bees, which evolved in the Old World, are less efficient at collecting pollen from New World crops.
Though not directly related to colony collapse disorder, a phenomenon which remains unexplained, the results of the study helped to shed some light on the many factors involved in stressing honey bee populations.
Read more: http://www.sciencerecorder.com/news/bees-health-damaged-by-common-agricultural-chemicals-researchers-find/#ixzz2aFTdEGi9

Bees’ health damaged by common agricultural chemicals, researchers find

Previously, researchers did not believe fungicides had a negative effect since they’re not designed to kill insects.

The study, published this week in the journal PLOS ONE, is the first to analyze real-world conditions honey bees encounter while pollinating various types of crops.

Researchers from the University of Maryland and the U.S. Department of Agriculture collected pollen samples from hives in Delaware all the way to Maine. Samples were analyzed to determine the bees’ main pollen sources and what agricultural chemicals commingled with the pollen. To test their ability to resist Nosema ceranae – a parasite linked to colony collapse disorder – the researchers fed the collected pollen samples to healthy bees

Every sample contained sub-lethal levels of multiple agricultural chemicals, with an average of 9 different chemicals being present. One sample containing 21 different pesticides. Fungicide chlorothalonil, a pesticide commony used on apples, and fluvalinate, an insecticide used by beekeepers to control mites, were present most frequently.

Surprisingly, the study found that bees fed pollen samples containing chlorothonatil were almost three times as likely to be infected by Nosema, than bees not exposed to the fungicide. The insecticide used to control mites also impaired the bees’ ability to withstand nfection.

Beekeepers are aware of the risks involved in using miticides, as the chemicals compromise a bee’s immune system. But the damage is less than if mites were left unchecked. However, the discovery that common fungicides are harmful at real world dosages is new information, pointing to gaps in existing regulations.

Previously, researchers did not believe fungicides had a negative effect since they’re not designed to kill insects. At present, federal regulations restrict the use of insecticides while pollinating insects are foraging, but there are no such restrictions on fungicides. In light of this new information, researchers suggest this policy be reconsidered.

Unexpectedly, most of the crops being pollinated did not appear to provide their hives with much nourishment. When the team collected samples from bees foraging native North American crops, like blueberries and watermelon, they discovered the pollen came from other flowering plants in the area. This suggests that honey bees, which evolved in the Old World, are less efficient at collecting pollen from New World crops.

Though not directly related to colony collapse disorder, a phenomenon which remains unexplained, the results of the study helped to shed some light on the many factors involved in stressing honey bee populations.



Read more: http://www.sciencerecorder.com/news/bees-health-damaged-by-common-agricultural-chemicals-researchers-find/#ixzz2aFTdEGi9




  1. sparklefunshine reblogged this from scienceyoucanlove
  2. victoria-versus-victoria reblogged this from scienceyoucanlove
  3. zoeynanae reblogged this from scienceyoucanlove
  4. odelotjr reblogged this from scienceyoucanlove
  5. volarmiangel reblogged this from scienceyoucanlove
  6. envisciki reblogged this from scienceyoucanlove and added:
    It isn’t fair to bees and other animals to be impacted so negatively by humans. Animals should be able to survive and...
  7. omgpuffinn reblogged this from scienceyoucanlove
  8. environmentalstewardship reblogged this from scienceyoucanlove
  9. mr-gay-aka-johnny-boy reblogged this from scienceyoucanlove
  10. tumainidamac reblogged this from scienceyoucanlove
  11. victorielisa reblogged this from immortalalien
  12. daftmapache reblogged this from immortalalien
  13. mantic-misfit reblogged this from immortalalien
  14. immortalalien reblogged this from megacosms
  15. the-bee-brigade reblogged this from scienceyoucanlove
  16. satanicpizzaparty reblogged this from sagansense
  17. artemiswisdom reblogged this from rhamphotheca
  18. vanesa reblogged this from scienceyoucanlove
  19. sweetheartcake reblogged this from rhamphotheca
  20. apoeticfool reblogged this from dgem69
  21. driftingdeeper reblogged this from scienceyoucanlove
  22. ispillmyteaalot reblogged this from hymnoptera
  23. effyeahplants reblogged this from somuchscience
  24. panther0302 reblogged this from iwannajamitwithyou
  25. xxtemple-of-starsxx reblogged this from scienceyoucanlove
  26. gwenmcgregor reblogged this from rhamphotheca
  27. astray-thought reblogged this from heytherepumpkin
  28. heytherepumpkin reblogged this from skelleyton
  29. sires-children reblogged this from rhamphotheca
  30. hymnoptera reblogged this from hotdogcephalopod
  31. notasurfingmovie reblogged this from scienceyoucanlove
  32. k-a-i-r-o-s reblogged this from skelleyton
  33. skelleyton reblogged this from moniquill
  34. thesmallgodlaughs reblogged this from queeriophile
  35. queeriophile reblogged this from communerd and added:
    :( poor bees!